X

You deserve more, Find tenders and business leads on the GO

Download Online Tenders iOS app Download Online Tenders Android app
Online Tenders
  • VIEW TENDERS
  • PRICING
    • Home
    • Browse Tenders
    • Pricing
    • How it Works
    • Tender Resources
    • FAQ
    • Signup
    • Login
    • Contact Us
  • LOGIN
  • SIGN UP
Resources How to Tender Tender Articles Tender Sectors Tender News

Tender: Eskom mulls legal route

Eskom is considering going to the Constitutional Court after the Supreme Court of Appeal set aside the R5 billion nuclear contract awarded to French company Areva. The appeal court ruled that Eskom’s awarding of the tender had been “irrational and unlawful”. Eskom spokesperson Khulu Phasiwe said Eskom’s legal team was studying the court judgment and the implications it may have on the current contract the electricity utility had with Areva. “One of the options we might pursue is to take the matter to the Constitutional Court for review,” Phasiwe said. The tender was to replace the ageing steam generators at the Koeberg nuclear power station. Asked if taking the matter to the Constitutional Court would not result in a delay that could have an effect on the safety of Koeberg, Phasiwe said the steam generators were due for replacement only in 2018.

“We hope the matter will be resolved in the first half of next year,” he said. The appeal court judgment was the result of a rival bidder, Westinghouse Electric Belgium, taking legal action to have the tender awarded to Areva in August 2014, reviewed and set aside. Westinghouse argued in the Gauteng High Court that the decision to award the tender to Areva had been taken unlawfully as Eskom’s board tender committee had awarded it based on “strategic considerations” which had not been part of the stated bid criteria. Westinghouse had not been told about the other criteria. Westinghouse lost the case in the high court. However the appeal court found the high court had overlooked the principle that in assessing the lawfulness of the tender process, a court must consider only whether the bids had been properly evaluated against the tender criteria. It found the high court had not taken into account that Westinghouse had not known what these “strategic criteria” were before the tender was awarded, so had not been given an opportunity to deal with them. The high court had also not taken into account that a bid should be evaluated only against the bid criteria contained in the invitation to tender.

Source: www.iol.co.za
BACK TO NEWS

Latest News

  • eThekwini Municipality under fire for expensive smart meter purchases
  • Transnet and United Manganese of Kalahari sign 10-year contract
  • Legal battle stalls for South African BEE firm amid IDEMIA acquisition talks
  • How bargaining councils are fighting the construction mafia
  • Investigations into R3.2 billion tender lead to executives facing charges
  • Msunduzi Municipality fleet boss jailed for 10 years for tender bribes
  • The Strand seawall project
  • Transport Department races to clear 733,000 driving licence backlog
  • Serious procurement irregularities in Lesseyton Sports Facility
  • KZN introduces innovative e-procurement system to combat corruption
  • ONLINE TENDERS © 2024
  • Terms
  • Privacy
  • Resources
  • Contact Us
By continuing past this page, you agree to our Terms of Service, Cookie Policy, Privacy Policy and Content Policies. All trademarks are properties of their respective owners. 2007-2025 © Online Tenders CC. All rights reserved.
By using this site you agree to OnlineTenders use of cookies to give you a personalised experience. Please read the cookie policy for more information.
Accept